Hamza Can Ovacık (cancan3458.lens) Lens Protocol social identity (.lens handle) Profile

Lens Chain has passed the @lens/zksync vote for inclusion in the Elastic Network. Mainnet is coming soon. <https://vote.zknation.io/dao/proposal/53064417471903525695516096129021600825622830249245179379231067906906888383956?govId=eip155:324:0x76705327e682F2d96943280D99464Ab61219e34f>

Real DAOs trade on premium.

Lens v2 on Polygon → Lens v3 on Lens Chain Migration. The Lens team migrated 125GB of profiles, managers, connections, and content to Lens Chain—the largest onchain migration ever. In collaboration with @lens/zksync, the Lens team developed a migration solution that does not require user intervention and preserves maximum data integrity. Migrating data between blockchains at this scale was unprecedented. Existing tools fell short, so we built an adaptable migration framework that can potentially support other projects moving to Lens Chain. The migration successfully transferred 125GB of smart contract storage logs, including: \- 650,000 user accounts and their digital identities \- 650,000 unique usernames \- 28 million follower connections preserving the social graph \- 360 applications ensuring ecosystem continuity \- 16 million posts with user-generated content The Lens team, in collaboration with @lens/hey, @lens/orb, @lens/tape , and @lens/soclly, built a migration framework so they'll be fully operational on Lens Chain from day one. This coordinated effort will give Lens Chain users immediate access to V3's features. The successful Lens V2 on Polygon to Lens V3 on Lens Chain migration process represents a milestone for the blockchain industry. We have prepared a full report including best practices for large scale migrations in the blogpost. Upon mainnet launch, Lens users can effortlessly use apps, interact with content, and manage accounts on the new Lens Chain. Read more: https://www.lens.xyz/news/migrating-the-lens-ecosystem-to-lens-chain

Migration done ✅ Lens Chain will start with nice 125GB of onchain social data from get-go.

🚨 $LINEA TGE delayed – not happening in Q1 🔸 A minimum LXP requirement will be enforced. According to @LineaBuild’s marketing lead, holding less than 1500 LXP is considered low activity and possibly Sybil. I support removing Sybil if done fairly and without harming real users. Even if an LXP threshold is set for the airdrop, onchain activity across different chains should also be considered. Holding less LXP alone doesn’t make someone a Sybil. 🔸 Also, there's an ongoing poll: ◆ Publish tokenomics first, then criteria, then the checker ◆ Publish everything at once but closer to TGE 💬 What are your thoughts?